Tapxpayers left with £600m exposure to cover the failure of Dunfermline Building Society
Following a deal brokered by the Bank of England and the Treasury over the weekend, the Government will transfer £1.6bn of state funds to Nationwide Building Society, which is taking £2.35bn of Dunfermline’s deposits and £250m of treasury investments in return for absorbing £1bn of its prime residential mortgages.
The transfer is being made because the assets Nationwide is assuming are £1.6bn less than the liabilities.
However, the cost will be split between the industry-backed deposit protection scheme and the taxpayer. Both the Treasury and the Financial Services Authority refused to reveal how much the Financial Services Compensation Scheme will cover, but insiders said it was “between £1bn and £1.5bn”.
In the worst case scenario, that would leave the taxpayer liable for £600m although any final loss is more likely to be in the tens of millions of pounds.
The labour Government’s reluctance to detail either the possible exposure or the potential loss drew criticism from the Conservatives. George Osborne, the shadow Chancellor, demanded to know: “What is the maximum possible loss for the taxpayer? What is the maximum exposure?”
Alistair Darling would only say there was “a small residual exposure for the Government”.
However, a further £650m of troubled commercial property loans as well as £150m of toxic self-certified mortgages bought from GMAC and Lehman Brothers has been placed with administrators KPMG.
The Government triggered the special resolution regime, which has been in place just a month, after the FSA judged that it needed £60m more capital to meet regulatory requirements and the authorities decided that “even with an injection of £60m, the society would need to come back for more”, Mr Darling said.
The authorities were prompted into action because a £250m floating rate note matured on Monday and the authorities did not want to risk a refinancing failure.
Nationwide is taking over Dunfermline’s 34 branches, head office and 534 employees. It has guaranteed there will be no job cuts at branches for three years but is expected to reduce staff numbers in the head office.
The contents of this blog are for information purposes only. It is not intended as a recommendation to trade or a solicitation for funds. The Wise Money Blog cannot be held responsible for any loss or damages arising from any action taken following consideration of this information.




March 31, 2009 | Posted by Dr Search- Principal Consultant at the Search Clinic 






















Categories:
Tags:





Recent Comments