The Liberal Democrats are holding the country to ransom while an unelected leader of the Labour Party remains Prime Minister.


It is a measure of Gordon Brown’s loose grip on reality that he sought to depict his decision to stand down later this year as a noble act of self-sacrifice made in the national interest. The truth is that this was an act of quite staggering cynicism based on naked party advantage.
With the incomprehensible connivance of Nick Clegg – whose reputation will surely never recover – Mr Brown is effectively seeking to nullify the result of last week’s general election. Blinded by his tribal loathing of the Conservatives, he is ready to risk everything – and the Daily Telegraph used that term advisedly – to keep David Cameron out of Downing Street.
This unelected leader of the Labour Party will remain Prime Minister, even though his party secured two million fewer votes and 48 fewer seats than the Tories.
He will then hand over at a time of his choosing to a new Labour leader. At that point, the United Kingdom will find itself governed by a Labour prime minister the country has not elected, succeeding a Labour prime minister neither the country nor his party elected. Even by Labour’s standards, this is self-serving and unscrupulous.
Mr Brown talked yesterday about the importance of a strong and stable government at a time of grave economic crisis. Yet he is seeking to concoct with the Liberal Democrats a governing coalition that will be inherently unstable and weak. A Lib-Lab pact cannot deliver a majority in the new House of Commons.
It will be reliant on the smaller parties – the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists, perhaps the DUP – to secure its business. What will that mean? That the English taxpayer will be expected to keep those parts of the UK in the heavily-subsidised style to which they have become accustomed.
This at a time of economic distress when deep cuts in the public services in England are inevitable. Just as pertinent, England voted decisively for the Tories last Thursday (297 seats to Labour’s 191), yet is to be effectively disenfranchised by the Brown/Clegg stitch-up.
Does Mr Brown realise how dangerous a game he is playing? He has made much over the past couple of years of his devotion to the Union, yet his political scheming will place it under immense strain.
And how exactly is a Labour leadership contest supposed to encourage stability? Campaigns were already gearing up last night. The notion that the challengers to succeed Mr Brown will be devoting their full energy to their ministerial jobs in the weeks and months ahead is, frankly, laughable.
The markets responded to Mr Brown’s pieties about stable government by plummeting. They assessed very quickly just how ramshackle such a cobbled-together coalition will be.
The prospect of swift and decisive action to tackle the deficit evaporated at precisely one minute to five yesterday, when Mr Brown made his surprise statement in Downing Street.
Why is this happening at all? This brings us to Mr Clegg and the Liberal Democrats. They are, in effect, holding the country to ransom in pursuit of a new voting system. An issue that featured nowhere on the list of voter priorities in the general election now dominates the political debate.
And the tail is wagging the dog. Last Thursday, the two parties that were formally opposed to PR, the Tories and Labour, between them polled 19 million votes. The party that supports PR polled fewer than seven million votes. Is this what Mr Clegg means when he talks about the “new politics”? And what is “new” about a deal brokered by three unelected Labour figures – Lying lords Mandelson and Adonis and Alastair Campbell?
Since last Friday we have lived with the fiction that Mr Brown was simply doing his constitutional duty by staying at the helm until a new government could be formed, acting in the national interest.
Now we see that all the time he has been acting in his and his party’s interest, defying the verdict of the electorate by trying to create a coalition of the election losers. This is a bleak day for our democracy.